Key result
Repeat flow-mediated dilation at 15 minutes blunts response by an absolute ~1.5%, recovering by 60 minutes.
Why the study?
The optimal interval between repetitive flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) measurements remains controversial, and the impact of recovery on vascular function indices is unclear.
Observational (n=55)
Blinded analysis
No
Absolute Event Rate: 5.1% vs 6.6%
p-value: p=<0.05
Repetitive short-interval flow-mediated dilation measurements may confound results; leaves open standardized recovery intervals for serial endothelial testing.
In repetitive measurements of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), the duration of the interval between measurements remains controversial. In this pilot study, we conducted three sequential measurements of low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC), FMD and flow-mediated total dilation (FMTD; L-FMC+ FMD) at baseline and intervals of 15 and 60 min in 30 healthy males. FMD15, L-FMC15, and FMTD15 were significantly lower than the respective first measurements, but all indices showed full recovery at 60 min in all subjects. The baseline diameter was slightly increased at 15 min and restored at 60 min, but the maximum diameter, and the baseline and reactive flow velocity unchanged. We examined the relationship between recovery rate of FMTD at 15 min (FMTD-R) and cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). Univariate analysis showed moderate correlation between FMTD-R, and CAVI and L-FMC0. Patients were divided according to FMTD-R value; the low-FMTD-R group [below the median value (-26.2%)] included a significantly higher proportion of smokers and higher CAVI values than the high-FMTD-R group. The reproducibility of FMTD and FMTD-R was evaluated in another group of 25 healthy subjects. The range of variation across measurements was 1.1% for FMTD and 4.6% for FMTD-R; with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.93 and 0.95, respectively. The present study demonstrated blunted recovery of FMD within 15 min, suggesting the need for selection of a more adequate interval between measurements to avoid underestimation of FMD in subsequent measurements. The findings demonstrated the reproducibility of FMTD-R and FMTD measurements, and that FMTD-R might be involved in arterial stiffness and early vascular impairment in the healthy subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
稲葉はつみ et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=55). Repetitive FMD measurement at 15-minute interval vs. Baseline FMD measurement was evaluated on Flow-mediated total dilation (FMTD) at 15 minutes (p=<0.05). In healthy men, repetitive measurement of flow-mediated total dilation at a 15-minute interval resulted in a significantly blunted response compared to baseline (5.10% vs 6.60%, p<0.05), which fully recovered by 60 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: