Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Restenosis by myointimal hyperplasia after peripheral arterial angioplasty or stenting is a major problem limiting its long-term efficiency and patency, and may lead to recurrent symptoms. Drug-eluting devices which inhibit the proliferation of neo-intimal growth of vascular smooth muscle cells may prevent restenosis. The aim of this article is to examine the evidence in published literature on the use of drug-eluting devices in the treatment of peripheral arterial diseases. A systematic literature review was undertaken of all published literature on this subject using Medline and cross-referenced. All published relevant articles on the use of drug-eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease were used. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and electronic databases were also searched for on-going studies. Published results from randomised studies such as the SIROCCO I and II Trials and the THUNDER study, together with single cohort studies, are now available. There are on-going studies comparing drug-eluting and non-drug-eluting devices. Evidence from the published literature suggests that drug-eluting stents and balloons are safe and effective in preventing restenosis after peripheral angioplasty. However, drug-eluting devices are more expensive and many are limited to single-use only. It is anticipated that results from all the on-going studies may allow a meta-analysis to show whether these preliminary data can translate into a clinically applicable cost-effective strategy in combating restenosis after peripheral angioplasty or stenting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: