Key result
Ultrasound probe integration into photon-based STAR maintains acceptable dosing despite modest conformity index increases.
Why the study?
Cardiorespiratory ultrasound motion monitoring may enhance precision of dose delivery for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation, but feasibility of photon-based STAR planning with an ultrasound probe was unknown.
Does photon-based STAR planning with ultrasound probe sparing maintain acceptable plan quality in patients with ventricular tachycardia?
Does photon-based STAR planning with ultrasound probe sparing maintain acceptable plan quality in patients with ventricular tachycardia?
p-value: p=<0.01
Integrating an echocardiographic ultrasound probe for motion management into photon-based STAR planning is dosimetrically feasible and maintains clinically acceptable plan quality.
Photon-based STAR planning with ultrasound probe is feasible without compromising dosimetry; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background and Purpose Cardiorespiratory ultrasound motion monitoring may enhance the precision of dose delivery for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) of ventricular tachycardia. This treatment planning study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of photon-based STAR planning in the presence of an ultrasound probe. Materials and methods For sixteen targets in fourteen patients, three treatment plans were retrospectively created and compared: a reference plan without an ultrasound probe and two plans in which the ultrasound probe was spared from the primary treatment beam (apical or parasternal probe positions). Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed for target/organ dose-volume and treatment beam metrics, conformity-indices and maximum probe exposure. Results The ultrasound probe could be spared from the primary beam in all cases with D 0.035 cm 3 < 1 Gy (median 0.2 Gy with apical and 0.4 Gy with parasternal placement) with slightly elevated organ dose-volume metrics and no significant differences in target dose-volume metrics. The conformity-index (50% isodose line) differed significantly for apical and parasternal probe position (median reference plan 4.0 vs. 5.0 and 4.5, respectively; p < 0.01). The parasternal position gave slightly superior results compared to the apical position (e.g., heart-PTV V 12.5 Gy 7.6% [4.7–13.3] vs. 8.2% [6.4–12.5]; left lung V 10 Gy 3.4% [1.0–4.6] vs. 4.2% [1.6–6.8]), albeit in all plans dose guidance parameter remained within clinically acceptable limits. Conclusions The ultrasound probe could be spared from the primary beam without compromising photon-based STAR plan quality beyond clinically acceptable deviations. The results support further investigation of ultrasound-based STAR motion management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oppitz et al. (2026) studied Ventricular tachycardia (n=14). Treatment plans with ultrasound probe spared from the primary beam (apical or parasternal positions) vs. Reference plan without an ultrasound probe was evaluated on Conformity-index (50% isodose line) (p=<0.01). Integrating an ultrasound probe into photon-based STAR planning maintained clinically acceptable doses, with conformity-indices of 5.0 (apical) and 4.5 (parasternal) vs 4.0 for reference plans (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: