Key result
Metabolically unhealthy obesity is linked to ~2.2-fold higher risk of incident ischemic heart disease.
Why the study?
Associations of metabolic obesity phenotypes with the onset and progression of ischaemic heart disease and related biomarker pathways were not fully understood.
Do metabolic obesity phenotypes increase the risk of incident ischaemic heart disease and subsequent progression to complications and mortality?
Cohort (n=336,386)
Yes
Do metabolic obesity phenotypes increase the risk of incident ischaemic heart disease and subsequent progression to complications and mortality?
Metabolically unhealthy obesity significantly elevates the risk of both incident ischaemic heart disease and its progression to complications (heart failure/arrhythmia) and death, with part of the risk mediated by systemic biomarkers like GGT and urate.
Supports metabolic phenotyping for IHD risk stratification beyond BMI; leaves open whether targeting MUO improves outcomes.
To examine associations of metabolic obesity phenotypes with the onset and progression of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and potential biomarker pathways. We analysed 336,386 UK Biobank participants free of IHD, heart failure, and arrhythmia at baseline. Participants were classified as metabolically healthy non-obesity (MHNO), metabolically healthy obesity (MHO), metabolically unhealthy non-obesity (MUNO), and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO). Cox regression and multi-state models estimated risks for IHD and subsequent transitions. Counterfactual mediation analyses quantified the mediating roles of serum urate, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and albumin. During follow-up, 27,183 participants developed IHD and 9,137 subsequently developed heart failure or arrhythmia. Compared with MHNO, adjusted HRs (95% CI) for incident IHD were 1.43 (1.37–1.50) for MHO, 1.63 (1.58–1.68) for MUNO, and 2.16 (2.09–2.22) for MUO; corresponding HRs were 1.58 (1.46–1.71), 1.59 (1.50–1.67), and 2.42 (2.29–2.55) for complications, and 1.18 (1.12–1.24), 1.29 (1.25–1.33), and 1.48 (1.43–1.54) for all-cause mortality. In multi-state analyses, MUO remained associated with progression from IHD to complications (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.11–1.23) and from complications to death (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.16–1.46). For MUO, GGT accounted for the largest mediation proportions for incident IHD (13.23%) and all-cause mortality (35.52%), while urate showed the greatest mediation proportion for IHD complications (14.51%). Metabolic obesity phenotypes showed distinct associations with IHD onset and progression. Urate, GGT, SIRI, and albumin explained part of MUO-related risk, supporting risk stratification integrating metabolic status and biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischaemic heart disease (onset and progression) (n=336,386). Metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO) vs. Metabolically healthy non-obesity (MHNO) was evaluated on Incident ischaemic heart disease (HR 2.16, 95% CI 2.09-2.22, p=<0.001). Metabolically unhealthy obesity was associated with significantly increased risks of incident ischaemic heart disease (HR 2.16) and its complications compared with metabolically healthy non-obesity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: