Why the study?
Objective assessment of left ventricular function is key for guiding therapy in heart failure, but LVEF is dynamic and identifying patients at risk of decline would improve prognostication and intervention timing.
Does the PULSE-HF deep learning model accurately predict an LVEF below 40% within one year in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=68,740)
Yes
Does the PULSE-HF deep learning model accurately predict an LVEF below 40% within one year in patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: AUROC 87.5% to 91.4%
A novel deep learning model integrating standard or single-lead ECGs with historical LVEF data can robustly forecast significant systolic decline within one year, enabling timely clinical intervention.
Background: Objective assessment of left ventricular function remains a key prognosticator that is used to guide therapeutic decisions for patients with heart failure (HF). However, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is dynamic, with worsening LVEF linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients at risk of LVEF decline would improve prognostication and enable timely therapeutic intervention. Methods: We developed a deep learning model to Predict changes in left ventricULar Systolic function from Electrocardiograms (ECG) of patients who have Heart Failure (PULSE-HF). The model integrates 12-lead ECG waveforms with a patient's history of prior LVEF measurements to calculate the likelihood that the LVEF will be less than 40% during the year after the ECG is obtained. The model is retrospectively developed and tested using data from one hospital and externally validated on retrospective cohorts from two different hospitals. The internal development data was collected between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021. The external validation datasets were collected between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021 at one hospital and between 2008 and 2019 at the other hospital. Findings: PULSE-HF demonstrates strong discriminatory ability with respect to forecasting whether the LVEF would be below 40% within the next year, achieving areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 87.5-91.4% across all three HF cohorts. Among patients with HF who have a baseline LVEF above 40%, PULSE-HF effectively identified those at risk of worsening LVEF with AUROCs of 81.6-86.3% across all three datasets. PULSE-HF's discriminatory ability remained consistently high across a range of subgroups with different comorbidities and regardless of medical therapy. Assuming an underlying prevalence of LVEF worsening of 10% per year, PULSE-HF's negative predictive values are over 97%, assuming an underlying sensitivity of 80%. Lastly, we demonstrate that a lead I version of PULSE-HF has a performance similar to the performance of the model that uses all 12 ECG leads. Interpretation: PULSE-HF robustly predicts worsening LVEF in patients who have a prior diagnosis of HF. The method provides a platform for identifying patients who are at an increased risk of worsening systolic dysfunction. Funding: This work was supported, in part, by a grant from Quanta Computers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergamaschi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=68,740). PULSE-HF deep learning model vs. Logistic regression model was evaluated on Prediction of whether LVEF would be below 40% within one year after the ECG (AUROC 87.5% to 91.4%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: