Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Copyright © 2012 Meinken and Min. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Computational prediction of protein subcellular locations in eukaryotes facilitates experimental design and proteome analysis. We provide a short review on recent development of computational tools and our experience in evaluating some of these tools. Classical secretomes can be relatively accurately predicted using computational tools to predict existence of a secretory signal peptide and to remove transmembrane proteins and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) proteins. The protocols of differentially combining SignalP, Phobius, WoLFPSORT, and TargetP for identifying a secretory signal peptide in different kingdom of eukaryotes, with TMHMM for removing transmembrane proteins and PS-Scan for removing ER proteins significantly improve the secretome prediction accuracies. Our evaluation showed that current computational tools for predicting other subcellular locations, including mitochondrial or chloroplast localization, still need to be improved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meinken et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: