Key result
Malnutrition affects ~17% of patients, with strong correlation across standard screening tools.
Why the study?
Malnutrition significantly affects prognosis in elderly patients with HFrEF, but comparative evaluation of different nutritional assessment tools is needed.
What is the prevalence of malnutrition in geriatric HFrEF patients, and how do MNA, MNA-SF, SGA, and CONUT screening tools correlate?
Cross-Sectional (n=138)
No
What is the prevalence of malnutrition in geriatric HFrEF patients, and how do MNA, MNA-SF, SGA, and CONUT screening tools correlate?
Malnutrition is highly prevalent in geriatric HFrEF patients, and MNA, MNA-SF, SGA, and CONUT serve as reliable and correlated assessment tools.
Malnutrition screening may warrant consideration in geriatric HFrEF; leaves open prognostic impact and optimal tool selection.
Introduction Malnutrition is a significant problem affecting the prognosis of elderly patients with heart failure. The objective of this study is to evaluate the nutritional status of geriatric patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) and to compare the effectiveness of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form( MNA-SF), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) malnutrition screening tools. Materials and methods One hundred thirty-eight patients aged 65 and over with heart failure were included in this study conducted at a tertiary care center. All participants were evaluated using the MNA, MNA-SF, SGA and CONUT score. Demographic data, clinical parameters, and laboratory findings were recorded. Results The prevalence of malnutrition was found to be 16.7% according to MNA, 17.4% according to SGA, and 13.0% according to CONUT score. A significant correlation was found between all three assessment tools ( p < 0.01). The malnutrition risk was identified in 47.8% of patients using MNA, while moderate malnutrition was detected in 43.5% using SGA, and mild malnutrition in 45.0% using CONUT score. Conclusion Malnutrition is a common problem in geriatric heart failure patients, requiring routine screening. All three assessment tools showed good correlation, suggesting their reliability in clinical practice. The MNA can be recommended as an initial screening tool, while SGA provides detailed assessment, and CONUT offers objective parameters. Integration of nutritional assessment into standard care protocols for geriatric heart failure patients is essential for improving clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yıldırım et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=138). Malnutrition assessment (MNA, MNA-SF, SGA, CONUT) was evaluated on Prevalence of malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition was 16.7% by MNA, 17.4% by SGA, and 13.0% by CONUT, with significant correlations among the tools (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: