Key result
The CONUT score independently predicted 1-year cardiac events (HR 1.132) and physical function decline during hospitalization in patients with acute heart failure, outperforming the GNRI and MNA-SF.
Why the study?
Undernutrition is very common among patients with HF, but the comparative prognostic values of different nutritional risk/screening indices in acute HF were unclear.
Does the CONUT score predict cardiac events and physical functioning decline in patients with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=465)
No
Does the CONUT score predict cardiac events and physical functioning decline in patients with acute heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.132 (95% CI 1.028–1.246)
p-value: p=0.012
The CONUT score is a useful and independent predictor of 1-year cardiac events and in-hospital physical function decline in patients with acute heart failure, outperforming the GNRI and MNA-SF indices.
May aid risk stratification in acute HF; hypothesis-generating for nutritional tools pending prospective validation.
Undernutrition is very common among patients with heart failure (HF). This study evaluated the prognostic values of three nutritional risk/screening indices among patients with acute HF. We retrospectively calculated scores for 465 patients with acute HF using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) tool, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF). The outcomes of interest were the 1-year rate of cardiac events (cardiac-related death or HF-related readmission) and the Barthel index as an index of physical function during hospitalization. The CONUT, GNRI, and MNA-SF scores were significantly correlated, although the proportions of a normal nutritional state varied (CONUT: 18.3%, GNRI: 32.9%, and MNA-SF: 43.9%). Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed that cardiac events were more common among patients with undernutrition based on the CONUT score, and multivariable regression analysis revealed that only the CONUT score independently predicted poor outcomes. Furthermore, changes in the Barthel index during hospitalization were significantly correlated with the CONUT score but not with the GNRI and MNA-SF scores. In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the CONUT score had the most powerful predictive values on both the postdischarge incidence of cardiac events and the decline of physical function during hospitalization compared with the GNRI and the MNA-SF. These results indicate that the CONUT score might provide useful information for predicting poor outcomes in patients with acute HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uemura et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute Heart Failure (n=465). Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score vs. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) was evaluated on Composite of cardiac-related death or readmission because of HF at 1 year (HR 1.132, 95% CI 1.028-1.246, p=0.012). The CONUT score independently predicted 1-year cardiac events (HR 1.132) and physical function decline during hospitalization in patients with acute heart failure, outperforming the GNRI and MNA-SF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: