Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To improve N2 selectivity and lower the cost, WO3 in V2O5/WO3–TiO2 was substituted by a low cost composition Fe2O3 for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3. The SCR reaction over V2O5/Fe2O3–TiO2 mainly followed the Eley–Rideal mechanism (i.e. the reaction between activated ammonia species and gaseous NO). There were two active components on V2O5/WO3–TiO2 for the activation of adsorbed NH3 (i.e. V5+ and Fe3+). The acid sites on V2O5/Fe2O3–TiO2 mainly resulted from the support Fe2O3–TiO2, so the adsorbed NH3 preferred to be activated by Fe3+ rather than by V5+. V5+ on V2O5/Fe2O3–TiO2 could accelerate the regeneration of Fe3+ on Fe2O3–TiO2 due to the rapid electron transfer between V5+ and Fe2+ on the surface, so the activation of adsorbed NH3 by Fe3+ was promoted. As some NH3 adsorbed on V2O5/Fe2O3–TiO2 was not activated by Fe3+, the inactivated NH3 could then be activated by V5+ on the surface. As a result, 2% V2O5/Fe2O3–TiO2 showed excellent SCR activity, N2 selectivity and H2O/SO2 durability at 300–450 °C. Furthermore, the emission of 2% V2O5/Fe2O3–TiO2 to the fly ash can be prevented by an external magnetic field due to its inherent magnetization. Therefore, 2% V2O5/Fe2O3–TiO2 could be a promising low-cost catalyst in NO emission control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: