Key result
Aortic-brachial pulse wave velocity ratio provides pressure-independent arterial stiffness assessment for CV risk prediction.
Why the study?
The nonlinear relationship between carotid-femoral PWV and blood pressure complicates the assessment of arterial stiffness, motivating evaluation of aortic-brachial PWV ratio as a blood pressure-independent measure of vascular aging.
May enhance cardiovascular risk prediction independent of blood pressure; leaves open validation in prospective cohorts.
Background: Aortic stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV), is used for the prediction of cardiovascular risk. This mini-review describes the nonlinear relationship between cf-PWV and operational blood pressure, presents the proposed methods to adjust for this relationship, and discusses a potential place for aortic-brachial PWV ratio (a measure of arterial stiffness gradient) as a blood pressure-independent measure of vascular aging. Summary: PWV is inherently dependent on the operational blood pressure. In cross-sectional studies, PWV adjustment for mean arterial pressure (MAP) is preferred, but still remains a nonoptimal approach, as the relationship between PWV and blood pressure is nonlinear and varies considerably among individuals due to heterogeneity in genetic background, vascular tone, and vascular remodeling. Extrapolations from the blood pressure-independent stiffness parameter β (β0) have led to the creation of stiffness index β, which can be used for local stiffness. A similar approach has been used for cardio-ankle PWV to generate a blood pressure-independent cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). It was recently demonstrated that stiffness index β and CAVI remain slightly blood pressure-dependent, and a more appropriate formula has been proposed to make the proper adjustments. On the other hand, the negative impact of aortic stiffness on clinical outcomes is thought to be mediated through attenuation or reversal of the arterial stiffness gradient, which can also be influenced by a reduction in peripheral medium-sized muscular arteries in conditions that predispose to accelerate vascular aging. Arterial stiffness gradient, assessed by aortic-brachial PWV ratio, is emerging to be at least as good as cf-PWV for risk prediction, but has the advantage of not being affected by operating MAP. Key Messages: The negative impacts of aortic stiffness on clinical outcomes are proposed to be mediated through attenuation or reversal of arterial stiffness gradient. Aortic-brachial PWV ratio, a measure of arterial stiffness gradient, is independent of MAP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortier et al. (2017) conducted a review in Cardiovascular risk and arterial stiffness. Aortic-brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV) ratio was evaluated. The aortic-brachial pulse wave velocity ratio is an emerging measure of arterial stiffness gradient for cardiovascular risk prediction that is not affected by operating mean arterial pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: