Key result
The ratio of carotid-femoral to carotid-radial pulse wave velocity provides a better estimation of the loss of stiffness gradient and may be a better predictor of mortality than aortic stiffness alone.
Why the study?
Does the arterial stiffness gradient (PWV ratio) provide better mortality risk prediction compared to classical carotid-femoral PWV?
Does the arterial stiffness gradient (PWV ratio) provide better mortality risk prediction compared to classical carotid-femoral PWV?
The arterial stiffness gradient, measured by the PWV ratio, offers a unifying physiological explanation for the impact of aortic stiffness on the microcirculation and may improve cardiovascular risk prediction.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality in various clinical conditions. The aim of this review is to focus on the arterial stiffness gradient, to discuss the integrated role of medium-sized muscular conduit arteries in the regulation of pulsatile pressure and organ perfusion and to provide a rationale for integrating their mechanical properties into risk prediction. SUMMARY: The physiological arterial stiffness gradient results from a higher degree of vascular stiffness as the distance from the heart increases, creating multiple reflective sites and attenuating the pulsatile nature of the forward pressure wave along the arterial tree down to the microcirculation. The stiffness gradient hypothesis simultaneously explains its physiological beneficial effects from both cardiac and peripheral microcirculatory points of view. The loss or reversal of stiffness gradient leads to the transmission of a highly pulsatile pressure wave into the microcirculation. This suggests that a higher degree of stiffness of medium-sized conduit arteries may play a role in protecting the microcirculation from a highly pulsatile forward pressure wave. Using the ratio of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) to carotid-radial PWV, referred to as PWV ratio, a recent study in a dialysis cohort has shown that the PWV ratio is a better predictor of mortality than the classical carotid-femoral PWV. KEY MESSAGES: Theoretically, the use of the PWV ratio seems more logical for risk determination than aortic stiffness as it provides a better estimation of the loss of stiffness gradient, which is the unifying hypothesis that explains the impact of aortic stiffness both on the myocardium and on peripheral organs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortier et al. (2015) conducted a review in Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular mortality. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) ratio (carotid-femoral to carotid-radial PWV) vs. Classical carotid-femoral PWV was evaluated on Mortality risk prediction. The ratio of carotid-femoral to carotid-radial pulse wave velocity provides a better estimation of the loss of stiffness gradient and may be a better predictor of mortality than aortic stiffness alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: