Key result
Higher uric acid-to-albumin ratio linked to ~2.9-fold higher risk of ISR per 0.1-unit increase.
Why the study?
The comparative predictive value of four albumin-based biomarker ratios for in-stent restenosis after primary PCI in STEMI patients was unclear.
Do albumin-based biomarker ratios (CAR, PAR, CALR, UAR) independently predict in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI?
Cohort (n=608)
No
Do albumin-based biomarker ratios (CAR, PAR, CALR, UAR) independently predict in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI?
Hazard Ratio: 2.93 (95% CI 2.06–4.16)
p-value: p=<0.001
Calcium-to-albumin and uric acid-to-albumin ratios are strong, independent long-term predictors of in-stent restenosis following primary PCI for STEMI, offering accessible biomarkers for risk stratification.
This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the predictive value of four albumin-based biomarker ratios — C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR), calcium-to-albumin ratio (CALR), and uric acid-to-albumin ratio (UAR) — for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 608 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI between January 2020 and January 2025 were retrospectively analyzed; the median follow-up was 59.3 months (IQR: 52.5–67.0), and ISR developed in 63 patients (10.4%). The association between the four ratios and restenosis was assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling. All four biomarkers were significantly higher in the ISR (+) group and showed significant discriminative ability on ROC analysis (UAR AUC=0.741, CALR AUC=0.710, CAR AUC=0.632, PAR AUC=0.614). All four ratios were independent predictors in multivariable logistic regression; however, in multivariable Cox regression, CAR lost statistical significance (HR=1.28, p=0.071), whereas UAR (HR=2.93, p<0.001), CALR (HR=2.97, p<0.001), and PAR (HR=1.16, p=0.010) remained independent predictors. RCS analysis revealed nonlinear threshold-type relationships for CAR, CALR, and UAR, whereas PAR demonstrated a linear dose-response relationship. In conclusion, CALR and UAR emerged as strong and consistent independent predictors of ISR risk in both cross-sectional and long-term analyses, whereas the predictive value of CAR was largely confined to the cross-sectional assessment
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duygu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=608). Uric acid-to-albumin ratio (per 0.1-unit increase) vs. Lower ratio levels was evaluated on In-stent restenosis (ISR) (HR 2.93, 95% CI 2.06-4.16, p=<0.001). A 0.1-unit increase in the uric acid-to-albumin ratio independently predicted a significantly higher risk of in-stent restenosis (HR 2.93) in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: