Key result
Greater pericoronary adipose tissue thickness linked to ~44% higher odds of coronary calcification per millimeter.
Why the study?
The comparative associations of pericoronary and epicardial adipose tissue thickness with coronary artery calcium score using cardiac CT were unclear.
Does pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) thickness correlate more strongly with coronary artery calcium score than epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness in patients undergoing cardiac CT?
Observational (n=1,032)
Does pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) thickness correlate more strongly with coronary artery calcium score than epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness in patients undergoing cardiac CT?
Odds Ratio: 1.436 (95% CI 1.298–1.588)
p-value: p=<0.001
Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) thickness is independently associated with higher coronary artery calcium scores and offers greater discriminatory performance for calcification than epicardial adipose tissue.
PURPOSE: To compare the associations of pericoronary (PCAT) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness with coronary artery calcium score (CACS) using cardiac computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 1,032 patients (516 women, 516 men; median age, 54 years) who underwent coronary CT angiography. CACS was quantified using the Agatston method. Mean PCAT thickness was measured at predefined anatomical landmarks along the major coronary arteries, while mean EAT thickness was assessed at the right ventricular free wall. Associations with CACS were evaluated using correlation, multivariable linear and logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Detectable coronary artery calcification was observed in 432 patients (41.9%). Although both PCAT (r = 0.461, p < 0.001) and EAT thickness (r = 0.375, p < 0.001) correlated with CACS, PCAT thickness remained significantly associated with higher CACS after adjustment for age, sex, and EAT thickness. In logistic regression, each 1-mm increase in PCAT thickness was associated with 43% higher odds of coronary calcification (OR, 1.436; 95% CI: 1.298-1.588; p < 0.001). PCAT showed greater discriminatory performance than EAT (AUC, 0.736 vs. 0.695; DeLong p = 0.010), and adding PCAT to an age-and-sex model increased the AUC from 0.744 to 0.795 (DeLong p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PCAT thickness was associated with CACS after adjustment for age, sex, and EAT thickness and showed greater discriminatory performance than EAT thickness for the presence of coronary calcification. PCAT thickness may provide additional imaging information from CCTA, although its incremental clinical value requires prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SANLİ et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery calcification (n=1,032). Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) thickness vs. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness was evaluated on Coronary calcification (OR 1.436, 95% CI 1.298-1.588, p=<0.001). Each 1-mm increase in pericoronary adipose tissue thickness was associated with 43% higher odds of coronary calcification (OR 1.436; 95% CI 1.298-1.588; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: