Key result
Higher epicardial, pericardial, and subcutaneous fat linked to up to ~230% greater significant CAC risk per SD.
Why the study?
Epicardial, pericardial, and subcutaneous adipose tissues mediate metabolic risk, but their association with coronary artery calcium presence and severity in asymptomatic individuals required investigation.
Are increased epicardial, pericardial, and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcium in asymptomatic individuals?
Comparison
Association of visceral and subcutaneous fat depots with CAC severity
Design
Cross-sectional study
Authors
Loading...
Increased epicardial, pericardial, and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes are independently associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcium, providing incremental prognostic value over traditional risk factors.
Cross-Sectional (n=111)
Blinded CT readers
No
Are increased epicardial, pericardial, and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcium in asymptomatic individuals?
Relative Risk: 3.3 (95% CI 1.9–5.6)
p-value: p=<0.05
Increased epicardial, pericardial, and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes are independently associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery calcium, providing incremental prognostic value over traditional risk factors.
Ahmadi et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Asymptomatic individuals at risk for coronary artery disease (n=111). Epicardial, pericardial, and subcutaneous adipose tissue vs. Lower levels of adipose tissue was evaluated on Presence of significant coronary artery calcium (CAC ≥ 100 vs CAC 0) (RR 3.3, 95% CI 1.9-5.6, p=<0.05). Each standard deviation increase in epicardial, pericardial, and subcutaneous adipose tissue increased the relative risk of significant coronary artery calcium by 3.3, 2.7, and 2.6, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: