Key result
COVID-19 linked to ~1.3-point higher immature platelet fraction vs stable CV controls.
Why the study?
There are no clinical or laboratory markers to guide antithrombotic therapy in COVID-19 patients despite high incidence of thromboembolic events.
Does COVID-19 infection increase immature platelet indices compared to acute myocardial infarction or stable cardiovascular risk factors?
Observational (n=211)
Does COVID-19 infection increase immature platelet indices compared to acute myocardial infarction or stable cardiovascular risk factors?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.8% vs 3.5%
p-value: p=0.005
COVID-19 patients exhibit elevated immature platelet indices that equal or exceed those seen in acute myocardial infarction, highlighting enhanced platelet turnover as a potential mechanism for thrombotic events in this population.
Higher immature platelet indices may aid COVID-19 risk stratification; leaves open whether they guide antithrombotic decisions.
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with high incidence of thromboembolic events, both venous and arterial. Currently, there are no clinical or laboratory markers to guide antithrombotic therapy in COVID-19 patients. Immature platelets represent a population of hyper-reactive platelets associated with arterial thrombotic events. Objectives To determine indices of immature platelets and platelet reactivity in Covid-19 patients. Methods This prospective study compared consecutive COVID-19 patients (n=47, median age = 56 years) to patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n=100, median age = 59 years) and a group of stable patients with cardiovascular risk factors (n=64, median age=68 years). Immature platelet fraction (IPF) and immature platelet count (IPC) were determined by the Sysmex XN-3000 auto-analyzer on admission and at subsequent time-points. Results IPF% on admission was higher in the Covid-19 group than the stable group and similar to the AMI group (4.8% [IQR 3.4–6.9], 3.5% [2.7–5.1], 4.55% [3.0–6.75], respectively, p=0.005 for Covid-19 vs. stable). IPC on admission was also higher in the Covid-19 group than the stable group and similar to the AMI group (10.8×109/L [8.3–18.1], 7.35×109/L [5.3–10.5], 10.7×109/L [7.7–16.8], respectively, P<0.0001 for Covid-19 vs. stable). The maximal IPF% among the Covid-19 group was higher than the stable group and similar to the AMI group. The maximal IPC in the Covid-19 group was higher than the maximal IPC in both the stable and AMI groups (Covid-19: 14.4×109/L [9.4–20.9], AMI: 10.9×109/L [7.6–15.2], P=0.0035, Stable: 7.55×109/L [5.55–10.5], P<0.0001). Conclusions Patients with Covid-19 have increased immature platelets indices compared to stable patients with cardiovascular risk factors, and as the disease progresses also compared to AMI patients. Enhanced platelet turnover and reactivity may, therefore, have a role in the development of thrombotic events in Covid-19 patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. IPF in COVID-19, AMI and stable groups
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harari et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Covid-19 (n=211). Covid-19 vs. Acute myocardial infarction or stable cardiovascular risk factors was evaluated on Immature platelet fraction (IPF) on admission (p=0.005). Patients with Covid-19 had a higher immature platelet fraction on admission (4.8% vs 3.5%; p=0.005) compared to stable patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: