Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Renewable power-to-hydrogen (ReP2H) enables large-scale renewable energy utilization and supports the decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors, such as chemicals and maritime transport, via hydrogen-based renewable ammonia and methanol fuels. As a result, utility-scale ReP2H projects are expanding worldwide. However, off-grid ReP2H systems exhibit low inertia due to their converter-dominated nature, making frequency security a critical concern. Although recent studies show that electrolyzers can contribute to frequency regulation (FR), their support capability depends on operating states and loading levels, creating a trade-off between hydrogen output and frequency security. To address this challenge, this work develops a unified co-optimization framework for frequency security-aware production scheduling of utility-scale off-grid ReP2H systems coordinating heterogeneous electrolyzers. A system-level frequency response model is established to capture multi-stage FR from alkaline water electrolyzers (AWEs), proton exchange membrane electrolyzers (PEMELs), and other resources, including ammonia-fueled generators retrofitted in co-located chemical plants, battery energy storage, and wind turbines (WTs). Stage-wise transient frequency security constraints are derived, reformulated into tractable forms, and embedded into production scheduling, enabling coordinated on/off switching and load allocation across electrolyzers to maximize hydrogen output under uncertain renewable power input while enforcing frequency security constraints. Case studies based on real-world systems demonstrate that the proposed approach allows hydrogen plants to replace 55.52% and 96.85% of FR reserves from WTs and AFGs, respectively, while improving the system-level net hydrogen yield by substantially reducing ammonia-fuel consumption. Year-long simulations show an average 28.96% increase in annual net profit resulting from reduced reliance on conventional reserves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: