Key result
Mitral regurgitation linked to ~2.5 mm larger ostial coronary sinus diameter.
Why the study?
There was no published quantitative data defining the magnitude of change in coronary sinus dimensions in mitral regurgitation and how these changes relate to MR severity.
Cross-Sectional (n=57)
Absolute Event Rate: 19.4% vs 16.9%
p-value: p=0.02
Larger coronary sinus dimensions in mitral regurgitation may inform device sizing; leaves open whether venography-guided selection improves annuloplasty outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to define the anatomy of the coronary sinus (CS) by venography. These measurements are essential in the selection of physical characteristics of percutaneous annuloplasty devices for mitral regurgitation (MR). BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of percutaneous annuloplasty of the CS for MR are now underway. Although the CS is in close proximity to the mitral annulus, there is as yet no published quantitative data defining the magnitude of change in CS dimensions in MR, and how these changes might reflect the magnitude of MR. METHODS: We studied 57 patients (27 patients with MR and 30 patients with no MR) who were referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy and underwent CS venography. Echocardiography was used to assess the degree of MR, cardiac dimensions, and right heart filling pressures. The diameter of the ostial and proximal CS and perimeter of the CS-great cardiac vein (GCV) were assessed by quantitative coronary analysis. RESULTS: Patients with MR had a larger ostial CS diameter (19.4+/-3.9 mm vs. 16.9+/-4.6 mm, P=0.02) and proximal CS diameter (8.2+/-1.7 mm vs. 7.4+/-2.3 mm, P=0.05) and larger CS-GCV perimeter (104.4+/-15.6 mm vs. 86.5+/-15.3 mm, P=0.005) compared with patients with no MR. The CS-GCV perimeter is positively correlated to the severity of MR (P=0.02) and pulmonary artery pressure (r=0.32, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MR have a dilated and outward displacement of the CS. The CS-GCV perimeter is positively correlated with the degree of MR and pulmonary artery pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2006) conducted a cross-sectional in Mitral regurgitation (n=57). Mitral regurgitation vs. No mitral regurgitation was evaluated on Ostial coronary sinus diameter (p=0.02). Patients with mitral regurgitation had a significantly larger ostial coronary sinus diameter (19.4 vs 16.9 mm) and coronary sinus-great cardiac vein perimeter (104.4 vs 86.5 mm) compared to those without.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: