Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by neuro-immune-metabolic-oxidative stress (NIMETOX) pathways. A systems-biology approach may help elucidate how these interconnected NIMETOX disturbances relate to early-life adversity and multidimensional clinical phenomes in adolescent MDD. Objectives: This study aimed to define the peripheral metabolic, vascular, and acute-phase, oxidative, and lipid biomarker profiles of adolescent MDD and to investigate associations with ACEs and clinical phenotypes. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 80 adolescents with MDD and 53 matched healthy controls and assessed C-peptide and insulin, vascular tone markers, the acute-phase inflammatory axis, oxidative stress, and lipid profiles. Results: MDD adolescents exhibited significant reductions in C-peptide, NO, ApoE, ApoA1, HDL-C, albumin, and transferrin, together with increased ApoB/ApoA1 ratio. These biomarkers correlated significantly with family dysfunction, childhood trauma, bullying exposure, and maladaptive parenting. These biomarkers and stressors accounted for 46.2% to 61.2% of the variance in psychological resilience, and major affective, physiosomatic, self-injurious, suicidal, and self-regulation phenomes. ACEs and bullying exposure, together with relevant socio-demographic data, explained 10.5% to 28.4% of the variance in selected metabolic, vascular, and acute-phase biomarkers. Multivariable classification models showed adequate discrimination between MDD and healthy controls, achieving up to 88.5% classification accuracy and an AUC of 0.948. Conclusion: Adolescent MDD is characterized by coordinated reductions in negative acute-phase proteins, metabolic and lipoprotein protective factors, and endothelial NO, without overt CRP-defined inflammation or conventional dyslipidemia. These findings support a systems-biology model of impaired peripheral homeostatic protection associated with developmental adversity and multidimensional depressive phenomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almulla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: