Key result
Worker cardiovascular risk rose up to ~5 percentage points during the pandemic before declining in 2022.
Why the study?
Time series data in Belgium showed a steady decrease in main CVD risk factors until 2020, followed by a steep rise in 2021, motivating quantification of CVD risk magnitude and evolution of non-laboratory metabolic and behavioral risk factors since 2019.
How did the prevalence of cardiovascular risk and associated non-laboratory risk factors evolve among Belgian workers across different occupational sectors between 2019 and 2023?
Observational (n=230,708)
How did the prevalence of cardiovascular risk and associated non-laboratory risk factors evolve among Belgian workers across different occupational sectors between 2019 and 2023?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous tracking of cardiovascular risk scores in occupational settings reveals significant temporal and sector-specific variations, largely driven by trends in systolic blood pressure, which can guide targeted workplace health interventions.
Background In Belgium, time series data starting from the early 1990s show a steady decrease of the prevalence of the main risk factors (e.g., smoking, high systolic blood pressure, and high body-mass index) for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) until 2020. However, in 2021, a steep rise in risk factor prevalence has been observed. In this study, we aim to quantify the magnitude of CVD risk over time as well as to describe the evolution in non-laboratory metabolic and behavioral CVD risk factors since 2019. Methods An observational study consisting of two parts has been conducted. First, general and sector-specific time series of CVD risk and CVD risk factors were described based on repeated cross-sectional data collected between 2019 to 2023 by Mensura, an occupational health service in Belgium. More specifically, 456,505 medical examinations in 230,708 Belgian workers were considered. The World Health Organization cardiovascular risk chart was used to determine risk profiles based on five biological and lifestyle variables (age, sex, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, and body mass index). Second, longitudinal relationships between CVD risk and its risk factors were inferred using linear mixed models to accommodate within-person association in repeated measurements on the same individual over time. Results Most employees with >10% CVD risk were men (94.7%). Occupational sectors exhibiting the lowest CVD risk were the healthcare, public, and education sector, while persons in construction, logistics, and metal industry showed the least favorable risk profiles. Across occupational sectors, the prevalence of people having risk of CVD > 10% risk increased (0.7 to 4.7%-point) from 2019 until 2021 but decreased again (0 to −4.5%-point) in 2022 in almost all sectors. Further in-depth analyses showed that both upward and downward trends were strongly associated with the evolution in high systolic blood pressure among participants. Conclusions Continued tracking of the evolution of CVD risk is essential. On the one hand, it guides where interventions are required (i.e., in high CVD risk occupational sectors). On the other hand, decomposing CVD risk into risk factors informs how interventions can be expedient (i.e., with focus on reducing high systolic blood pressure).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clercq et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=230,708). Time period (2019-2023) and occupational sector vs. Historical trends across years was evaluated on Prevalence of people having >10% cardiovascular disease risk. Between 2019 and 2021, the prevalence of workers with >10% cardiovascular risk increased by 0.7-4.7 percentage points, followed by a decrease of 0-4.5 percentage points in 2022 across most sectors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: