Key result
Decentralized cardiac rehabilitation linked to ~16% higher uptake, narrowing geographic and social inequalities.
Why the study?
Uptake of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery disease remains suboptimal due to barriers like transportation and geographic location, prompting decentralization strategies.
Does the decentralization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve uptake and reduce geographic and social inequalities in patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction, PCI, or CABG?
Cohort (n=19,080)
Yes
Does the decentralization of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve uptake and reduce geographic and social inequalities in patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction, PCI, or CABG?
Decentralizing cardiac rehabilitation to primary care settings significantly increases participation rates and reduces both geographic and social inequalities in post-ACS and post-revascularization patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Decentralization may increase cardiac rehab uptake and narrow disparities; extends observational data but leaves causal effects open for randomized trials.
Importance Despite clinical benefits and guideline recommendations, uptake of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following coronary artery disease remains suboptimal, with barriers including transportation issues, travel distance, and geographic location. To overcome these barriers, decentralization strategies that move health care to local settings have been developed across several countries. Objective To determine whether CR uptake improved following decentralization, and whether geographic and social inequalities were reduced. Design, Setting, and Participants This register-based cohort study used data from 2013 to 2022, with data analysis performed from April to August 2025. This population-based study was conducted within 21 Danish municipalities. All participants were patients aged 30 years or older discharged alive after acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients were identified in the Danish National Patient Register. Patients were excluded if they had a previous diagnosis or procedure or did not reside within the study area. Exposures Travel distance from home to nearest CR facility and educational level. Main Outcomes and Measures Uptake (attending at least 1 training session within 180 days from discharge) was analyzed using modified Poisson regression to quantify differences in proportions before and after decentralization with adjustment for relevant covariates. Results A total of 19 375 patients were eligible for the study, and 295 patients with missing information on exposures or covariates were excluded. Among the included 19 080 patients, 13 355 (70.0%) were male, and 10 868 (57.0%) were aged 60 to 79 years. The median (IQR) travel distance was reduced from 15.1 (5.9-25.7) km to 7.2 (2.8-14.8) km after decentralization, and uptake increased by 16% (risk ratio [RR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12-1.19). Among the 20% of patients with the longest travel distance, uptake increased by 45% (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.33-1.58), and geographic inequality was significantly reduced. Among patients with short education, uptake increased by 27% (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20-1.35), and social inequality was significantly reduced. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of 19 080 patients, there was increased uptake of CR after decentralization to primary care, accompanied by significant reductions in geographic and social inequalities. The findings support decentralized delivery of CR as a feasible and equitable model, but ongoing monitoring of quality and safety remains essential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bihrmann et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=19,080). Decentralization of cardiac rehabilitation vs. Before decentralization was evaluated on Uptake (attending at least 1 training session within 180 days from discharge) (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.12-1.19). Decentralization of cardiac rehabilitation to local settings increased uptake by 16% (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.12-1.19), accompanied by significant reductions in geographic and social inequalities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: