Why the study?
Cardiovascular patients with low socioeconomic status and non-western ethnic background have worse prognostic outcomes, but it was unknown whether short-term effects of cardiac rehabilitation are similar across these groups and whether rehabilitation diminishes known long-term prognostic disparities.
Does cardiac rehabilitation diminish socioeconomic and ethnical disparity in MACE among patients with coronary heart disease?
Does cardiac rehabilitation diminish socioeconomic and ethnical disparity in MACE among patients with coronary heart disease?
Conventional risk factor control and medical treatment following cardiac rehabilitation do not diminish the strong socioeconomic and ethnical disparities in coronary heart disease prognosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in MACE persist after CR; leaves open whether targeted interventions can mitigate upstream determinants.
AIMS: Cardiovascular patients with low socioeconomic status and non-western ethnic background have worse prognostic outcomes. The aim of this nationwide study was first to address whether short-term effects of hospital-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are similar across educational level and ethnic background, and secondly to study whether known disparity in long-term prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disese is diminished by CR participation. METHODS: All patients with myocardial infarction and/or coronary revascularization from August 2015 until March 2018 in the Danish national patient registry or the Danish cardiac rehabilitation database (DHRD) were included. We used descriptive statistics to address disparity in achievement of quality indicators in CR, and Cox proportional hazard regression to examine the association between the disparity measures and MACE (cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality) with adjustment for age, gender, index-diagnose and co-morbidity. RESULTS: We identified 34,511 patients of whom 19,383 had participated in CR and 9,882 provided information on CR outcomes from the DHRD. We demonstrated a socioeconomic gradient in improvements in VO2peak, and non-western patients were less often screened for depression or receive dietary consulting. We found a strong socioeconomic gradient in MACE irrespective of CR participation, medication, and risk factor control (adjusted HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.77) for high versus low education). Non-western origin was associated with higher risk of MACE (adjusted HR 1.2 (1.1-1.4)). CONCLUSION: We found only minor socioeconomic and ethnic differences in achievement of CR quality indicators but strong differences in CHD prognosis indication that conventional risk factor control and medical treatment following CR do not diminish the socioeconomic and ethnical disparity in CHD prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjesbu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: