Key result
T-TEER yields similar 1-year mortality and HF hospitalization as annuloplasty, with fewer procedural complications.
Why the study?
Comparative data on procedural and clinical outcomes between transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty for severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation remain limited.
Does transcatheter edge-to-edge repair compared to transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty improve procedural and clinical outcomes in patients with severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation?
Cohort (n=1,122)
Yes
Does transcatheter edge-to-edge repair compared to transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty improve procedural and clinical outcomes in patients with severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation?
T-TEER offers a more favorable safety profile and more effective early TR reduction compared to TTVA, though 1-year clinical outcomes appear comparable.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“These findings highlight the importance of procedural safety and durable TR reduction, while underscoring the complexity of translating procedural success into early clinical benefit and the need for longer-term evaluation.”
Similar 1-year outcomes after T-TEER versus TTVA; leaves open randomized trials to guide device selection in severe tricuspid regurgitation.
Background Transcatheter tricuspid valve (TV) interventions are an effective treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR). TV transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) and transcatheter TV annuloplasty (TTVA) represent distinct repair strategies; however, comparative data remain limited.Objectives The objective of the study was to compare procedural and clinical outcomes after T-TEER and TTVA in patients with severe secondary TR.Methods Consecutive T-TEER or TTVA-treated patients (2017-2024) were included. A 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed. Endpoints included residual TR ≤ 1+/≤2+, a ≥2-grade reduction, procedural complications, symptomatic improvement, reinterventions, and the composite of all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization within 1 year.Results Among 1,122 patients (882 T-TEER; 240 TTVA), 111 well-balanced matched pairs were identified. At discharge, T-TEER achieved higher rates of residual TR ≤ 1+ (50.0% vs 34.2%) and ≤2+ (87.7% vs 67.6%; all P < 0.05) compared with TTVA, whereas a ≥2-grade reduction was comparable. Procedural complications were less frequent with T-TEER (any complication: 4.5% vs 27.0% for T-TEER vs TTVA; P < 0.001). Symptomatic improvement and reintervention rates within 1 year were similar between groups. Freedom from the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization at 1-year was 75.0% (95% CI: 66.8-84.1) after T-TEER and 79.8% (95% CI: 72.4-87.9) after TTVA (P = 0.408).Conclusions In patients with severe secondary TR and sufficient clinical and anatomical overlap for matched comparison, T-TEER showed a more favorable safety profile and more effective, durable TR reduction, whereas early clinical outcomes at 1 year were comparable after adjustment for baseline differences, highlighting the need for longer-term evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stein et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation (n=1,122). Transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) vs. Transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TTVA) was evaluated on Freedom from the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization at 1-year (p=0.408). Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair yielded similar 1-year freedom from mortality or heart failure hospitalization compared to annuloplasty (75.0% vs 79.8%; P=0.408), with fewer procedural complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: