Why the study?
Heart failure exhibits heterogeneous biology and persistent morbidity and mortality, with incomplete understanding of molecular and clinical diversity between HFrEF and HFpEF.
A deeper mechanistic understanding of the distinct pathophysiology, cellular and molecular mechanisms, and immunologic pathways of HFrEF and HFpEF is essential to improve risk stratification and develop precise therapeutic strategies.
Differentiates HFrEF and HFpEF management by dominant mechanisms; extends LVEF classification to guide phenotype-specific trials.
Heart failure remains a major clinical and public health challenge due to its rising prevalence, heterogeneous biology, and persistent burden of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. Although left ventricular ejection fraction remains central to classification and treatment selection, it incompletely captures the molecular and clinical diversity of heart failure syndromes. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is commonly characterized by cardiomyocyte injury, impaired systolic force generation, neurohormonal activation, and adverse ventricular remodeling, which has enabled development of a standardized guideline-directed medical therapy framework. In contrast, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is driven by more heterogeneous and overlapping mechanisms, including cardiometabolic stress, endothelial dysfunction, coronary microvascular disease, inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, and impaired physiologic reserve. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the fundamental pathophysiology, cellular and molecular mechanisms, immunologic pathways, and contemporary therapeutic strategies in HFrEF and HFpEF. Emphasis is placed on the translational gap between mechanistic discovery and clinically actionable treatment selection. Emerging evidence suggests that future progress, especially in HFpEF, may depend on integrating molecular phenotyping with biomarkers, imaging, hemodynamics, comorbidity profiles, and social determinants of health. A more precise and equitable approach to heart failure care may improve risk stratification, therapeutic selection, and patient-centered outcomes across the full spectrum of disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart Failure (HFrEF and HFpEF).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: