Key result
Discharge MRA use linked to ~45% lower risk of death or HF rehospitalization in HFpEF.
Why the study?
The association of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use at discharge with long-term outcomes in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was unclear.
Does mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use at discharge reduce all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization in adults discharged after hospitalization for ADHF with preserved ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=194)
No
Does mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use at discharge reduce all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization in adults discharged after hospitalization for ADHF with preserved ejection fraction?
Hazard Ratio: 0.55 (95% CI 0.38–0.81)
Absolute Event Rate: 50.5% vs 72.2%
p-value: p=0.002
Prescribing mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists at hospital discharge for patients with acute decompensated heart failure and preserved ejection fraction is associated with significantly improved long-term clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: To examine whether mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use at discharge after hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with preserved ejection fraction is associated with long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of adults hospitalized with ADHF in 2015. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% who were discharged alive were included (time zero at discharge). Exposure was MRA (spironolactone or eplerenone) prescribed at discharge. The primary endpoint was time to first occurrence of all-cause death or rehospitalization for heart failure (HF); secondary endpoints were each component. RESULTS: Among 194 patients, 93 (47.9%) received an MRA at discharge. Median follow-up was 3.5 years (IQR, 1.4-5.1). The 3-year cumulative incidence of the primary composite was lower with MRA than without MRA (50.5% vs 72.2%; log-rank p = 0.02). The 3-year cumulative incidences of all-cause death and HF rehospitalization were numerically lower with MRA (31.1% vs 44.5%, p = 0.055; and 31.1% vs 44.5%, p = 0.09, respectively). After multivariable adjustment, MRA use was associated with lower hazard of the primary composite [hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.81; p = 0.002], all-cause death (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.92; p = 0.02), and HF rehospitalization (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.91; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with preserved ejection fraction discharged after ADHF, MRA use at discharge was associated with a lower hazard of the composite of all-cause death or HF rehospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morinaga et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=194). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone) vs. Without mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist was evaluated on Time to first occurrence of all-cause death or rehospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81, p=0.002). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use at discharge in patients with HFpEF was associated with a lower hazard of all-cause death or HF rehospitalization (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38-0.81; p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: