Key result
Higher iCEB is linked to ~2.3-fold higher odds of greater disability severity per unit.
Why the study?
The relationship between ventricular repolarization markers on ECG and disability burden in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis remains poorly understood.
Are electrocardiographic markers of ventricular repolarization (fQRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, iCEB) associated with disability severity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?
Cross-Sectional (n=202)
Blinded to clinical and neurological data
No
Are electrocardiographic markers of ventricular repolarization (fQRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, iCEB) associated with disability severity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?
Odds Ratio: 2.264 (95% CI 1.188–4.311)
p-value: p=0.013
Electrocardiographic indices of ventricular repolarization (frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, and iCEB) are altered in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and independently correlate with clinical disability severity.
Repolarization markers were associated with disability severity in RRMS; hypothesis-generating for autonomic monitoring, requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Autonomic dysfunction and increased cardiovascular risk are increasingly recognized in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Although several electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities have been described in MS, the relationship between ventricular repolarization markers and disability burden remains poorly understood. We investigated the association of selected ECG repolarization indices with disability severity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 101 clinically stable patients with RRMS and 101 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent standard 12-lead ECG evaluation. Disability severity was assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and categorized into four ordinal disability groups. Frontal QRS-T angle, Tpeak–Tend (Tp-e) interval, and index of cardiac electrophysiological balance (iCEB) were analyzed. Associations with disability burden were evaluated using Spearman correlation and multivariable proportional-odds ordinal logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, heart rate, serum potassium level, and fingolimod exposure. Compared with controls, patients with RRMS exhibited significantly wider frontal QRS-T angles, longer Tp-e intervals, and higher iCEB values (all p < 0.05). Across EDSS quartiles, QT interval, QTc, Tp-e interval, frontal QRS-T angle, iCEB, and iCEBc increased progressively with greater disability burden. Higher EDSS scores correlated with frontal QRS-T angle (ρ = 0.24, p = 0.012), iCEB (ρ = 0.30, p = 0.020), and Tp-e interval (ρ = 0.26, p = 0.018). In adjusted ordinal logistic regression analyses, frontal QRS-T angle (OR 1.023, 95% CI 1.005–1.042; p = 0.014), iCEB (OR 2.264, 95% CI 1.188–4.311; p = 0.013), and Tp-e interval (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.011–1.056; p=0.003) were independently associated with higher disability categories. ECG markers of ventricular repolarization are altered in RRMS and independently associated with disability burden. Frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, and iCEB may represent readily available electrophysiological indicators of disability-related autonomic and cardiovascular involvement in RRMS. Prospective longitudinal studies are required to determine their prognostic significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tunca et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) (n=202). Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and disability severity vs. Healthy controls / Lower disability severity was evaluated on Higher disability severity (Expanded Disability Status Scale category) per 1-unit increase in index of cardiac electrophysiological balance (iCEB) (OR 2.264, 95% CI 1.188-4.311, p=0.013). Higher values of ventricular repolarization markers, including the index of cardiac electrophysiological balance (iCEB), were independently associated with greater disability severity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (OR 2.264).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: