Key result
Drug-coated balloon use for de novo coronary lesions increases ~9-fold from 2020 to 2025.
Why the study?
Large-scale real-world data on the adoption of drug-coated balloons for de novo coronary lesions remain limited.
Observational (n=504,501)
Yes
Real-world adoption of drug-coated balloons for de novo coronary lesions increased more than eightfold between 2020 and 2025, largely driven by use in nonmain segments, clinically complex patients, and alongside intracoronary imaging.
BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are established for in-stent restenosis, whereas their role in de novo coronary lesions continues to evolve. Large-scale data on real-world adoption for native lesions remain limited. METHODS: We analyzed the nationwide National Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures (ORPKI), including all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed in Poland between January 2020 and December 2025. Procedures for in-stent restenosis, chronic total occlusion, and plain balloon angioplasty without drug coating were excluded. The final cohort comprised 504,501 PCI procedures for de novo native coronary lesions, classified as DCB-only, stent-only, or hybrid (DCB plus stent). Temporal trends, clinical and angiographic characteristics, and factors independently associated with a DCB-only strategy were assessed. RESULTS: DCB use increased more than eightfold, from 0.55% of procedures in 2020 to 4.78% in 2025 (P < .001); DCB-only use rose from 0.37% to 4.12%, and hybrid use from 0.20% to 0.66%. The increase was most pronounced in nonmain coronary segments (0.8%-9.5%). Compared with stent-treated procedures, DCB-only procedures more often involved diabetes, chronic kidney disease, previous myocardial infarction, previous PCI, and previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and chronic coronary syndromes. In multivariable analysis, nonmain segment location, previous PCI, previous CABG, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and the use of optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound, and fractional flow reserve were independently associated with a DCB strategy. CONCLUSIONS: DCB use for de novo coronary lesions increased markedly between 2020 and 2025, with a preference for nonmain, distal, and side-branch segments and for clinically complex patients, often alongside intracoronary imaging or physiological assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakowski et al. (2026) conducted an observational in De novo coronary lesions undergoing PCI (n=504,501). Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty vs. Stent-only procedures was evaluated on Temporal trends of drug-coated balloon use (p=<0.001). Drug-coated balloon use for de novo coronary lesions increased markedly from 0.55% of procedures in 2020 to 4.78% in 2025 (P<0.001), with a preference for nonmain segments and complex patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: