Key result
SMuRF-less STEMI status linked to ~2-fold higher 1-year MACE risk vs. SMuRF-positive patients.
Why the study?
SMuRF-less myocardial infarction may have different clinical implications in East Asian patients due to differing coronary pathophysiology and preventive treatment patterns compared to Western populations.
Does the absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRF-less status) increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in Japanese patients presenting with STEMI?
Cohort (n=2,310)
Yes
Does the absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRF-less status) increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in Japanese patients presenting with STEMI?
STEMI patients presenting without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors represent a distinct, highly vulnerable subgroup that paradoxically suffers from higher 1-year event rates and undertreatment with secondary preventive therapies.
SMuRF-less STEMI patients warrant closer surveillance in Japan; extends Western observations but leaves optimal management unresolved.
Background: Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factor (SMuRF)-less myocardial infarction, defined as the absence of diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking, may have different clinical implications in East Asian patients because coronary pathophysiology and preventive treatment patterns differ from those in Western populations. We hypothesized that SMuRF-less ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with poorer outcomes despite contemporary primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A total of 2310 STEMI patients (Male/Female: 1759/551; mean age: 67.2 years) from the Japan AMI Registry were stratified by SMuRF status and followed for one year. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Results: Among eligible patients, 136 (5.9%) were SMuRF-less. Compared with SMuRF-positive patients, SMuRF-less patients were older, more often female, had lower body mass index, and a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation. Despite similarly high primary PCI use, evidence-based secondary preventive therapies at discharge were less frequently prescribed in SMuRF-less patients. During a median follow-up of 358 days, MACE occurred more frequently in the SMuRF-less group (log-rank P < 0.01), and landmark analysis showed excess risk beyond the acute phase (log-rank P = 0.03). After adjustment for established prognostic factors, SMuRF-less status remained associated with unfavorable outcomes. A sex-stratified analysis suggested a more pronounced adverse association in men. An exploratory sex-stratified analysis suggested a more pronounced association in men. Conclusions: In the contemporary primary PCI era, Japanese SMuRF-less STEMI patients represent a distinct high-risk phenotype characterized by lower implementation of secondary preventive therapies and poorer 1-year outcomes extending beyond the acute phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wayama et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without prior coronary artery disease (n=2,310). SMuRF-less status (absence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors) vs. SMuRF-positive status (presence of at least one standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factor) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.22-3.23, p=<0.01). In Japanese STEMI patients, SMuRF-less status (absence of standard cardiovascular risk factors) was associated with an increased 1-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 2.00) compared to SMuRF-positive patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: