Key result
Dabigatran linked to ~58% lower MACE risk vs. apixaban in diabetes and AF.
Why the study?
Diabetes increases stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, necessitating comparison of effectiveness and safety among different NOACs in this population.
Does dabigatran reduce MACEs and all-cause mortality compared to apixaban in patients with diabetes and atrial fibrillation?
Cohort
No
Does dabigatran reduce MACEs and all-cause mortality compared to apixaban in patients with diabetes and atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.42 (95% CI 0.19–0.93)
p-value: p=0.032
In patients with diabetes and atrial fibrillation, dabigatran may be associated with a lower risk of MACEs and all-cause mortality compared to apixaban, with comparable major bleeding risk.
Background: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are widely used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of stroke in these patients, necessitating the careful selection of anticoagulant therapy. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of different NOACs in patients with both DM and AF. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with DM and AF treated with NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban) between December 2012 and June 2022 at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, and major bleeding. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risks associated with each NOAC. Results: -VASc score was 4.96 ± 1.76. No significant differences were observed among the four NOACs in the risks of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. Similarly, the risks of intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding were comparable across groups. However, dabigatran was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.93; p = 0.032) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-0.99; p = 0.047) compared with apixaban. Conclusions: In this single-center study, the risk of major bleeding was similar across the four NOACs. In addition, dabigatran was associated with lower risks of MACEs and all-cause mortality compared with apixaban.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran vs. Apixaban was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, p=0.032). In patients with diabetes and atrial fibrillation, dabigatran was associated with a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with apixaban (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.19-0.93).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: