Key result
Maintenance hemodialysis is linked to ~49 g/m² higher LVMI compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
Chronic kidney disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis exhibit cardiac remodeling beyond left ventricular hypertrophy, with potential myocardial dysfunction and mineral-metabolic abnormalities that require comprehensive evaluation.
Does long-term maintenance hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease associate with multidimensional structural and functional cardiac remodeling compared to healthy controls?
Cohort (n=180)
No
Does long-term maintenance hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease associate with multidimensional structural and functional cardiac remodeling compared to healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 145.6% vs 96.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
Patients on maintenance hemodialysis exhibit significant multidimensional cardiac remodeling and subclinical myocardial dysfunction (impaired global longitudinal strain) that strongly correlates with dialysis vintage, high blood pressure, and mineral-metabolic disturbances.
Supports strain imaging for early remodeling detection in hemodialysis; leaves open prospective validation for risk stratification in CKD.
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major cardiovascular burden in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and has traditionally been characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, growing evidence suggests that myocardial dysfunction and mineral-metabolic abnormalities may be associated with cardiac remodeling beyond hypertrophy alone. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate structural and functional cardiac alterations and their clinical-biochemical correlates in a retrospective cohort of long-term hemodialysis patients. Methods: We retrospectively identified 120 maintenance hemodialysis patients and 60 healthy controls. Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, including speckle-tracking, was analyzed to assess cardiac structure, myocardial mechanics, and diastolic function. Laboratory data, including hemoglobin and phosphate, were extracted. Correlation and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between clinical-biochemical variables and cardiac remodeling. Results: Hemodialysis patients showed significant cardiac remodeling, characterized by increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left atrial enlargement, and abnormal ventricular geometry. LVH was present in 68.3% of patients, with both concentric and eccentric hypertrophic patterns. Although Teichholz-derived left ventricular ejection fraction was relatively preserved, global longitudinal strain was significantly impaired and accompanied by a high prevalence of diastolic dysfunction. Dialysis duration, systolic blood pressure, phosphate, and hemoglobin were significantly associated with increased LVMI. Conclusions: Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis exhibited a multidimensional pattern of cardiac remodeling involving structural abnormalities, subclinical myocardial dysfunction, and mineral-metabolic dysregulation. Within the hemodialysis cohort, greater LVMI was associated with longer dialysis vintage, higher systolic blood pressure and phosphate levels, and lower hemoglobin levels. The marked impairment in myocardial strain highlights the potential value of myocardial deformation imaging for characterizing cardiac dysfunction in this population. Integrated structural, functional, and biochemical evaluation may improve early cardiovascular risk stratification in CKD-related cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic kidney disease (CKD) on maintenance hemodialysis (n=180). Maintenance hemodialysis vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (p=<0.001). Maintenance hemodialysis was associated with significant cardiac remodeling, including a markedly higher left ventricular mass index compared to healthy controls (145.6 g/m2 vs 96.3 g/m2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: