Key result
Para-Hisian RV pacing linked to ~29 ms narrower QRS and greater LV remodeling vs non-PHP.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Electrocardiographic markers identifying a favorable right ventricular pacing configuration for cardiac resynchronization therapy have not been well established.
Does an ECG-defined para-Hisian right ventricular pacing configuration improve electrical resynchronization and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients undergoing CRT?
Cohort (n=33)
Does an ECG-defined para-Hisian right ventricular pacing configuration improve electrical resynchronization and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients undergoing CRT?
Absolute Event Rate: 123.4% vs 151.9%
p-value: p=< 0.01
An ECG-defined para-Hisian right ventricular pacing configuration is associated with greater electrical resynchronization and improved left ventricular reverse remodeling following CRT.
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony; however, electrocardiographic markers identifying a favorable right ventricular (RV) pacing configuration have not been well established. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether an electrocardiography (ECG)-defined classification of RV pacing is associated with electrical and echocardiographic response to CRT. METHODS We retrospectively studied 33 consecutive patients who underwent CRT-pacing. RV pacing configuration was classified using predefined ECG criteria consisting of an R wave in lead I, a lead III/II R-wave ratio < 1 or inferior lead discordance, positive polarity in lead aVL, and absence of His bundle capture. Patients fulfilling all criteria were classified as the ECG-defined para-Hisian pacing (PHP) group (n = 7), and the remaining patients comprised the non-PHP group (n = 26). Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were compared at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS At 6 months, patients in the PHP group demonstrated significantly narrower QRS duration than those in the non-PHP group (123.4 ± 11.4 ms vs. 151.9 ± 20.2 ms, P < 0.01). The PHP group also exhibited greater reductions in left ventricular end-systolic volume (-34.8 ± 13.1% vs. -3.3 ± 31.3%, P < 0.05) and greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (12.6 ± 8.7% vs. 4.0 ± 10.2%, P < 0.05). Heart failure hospitalization rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS An ECG-defined para-Hisian RV pacing configuration was associated with greater electrical resynchronization and improved left ventricular reverse remodeling following CRT. These findings suggest that ECG characteristics of RV pacing may help identify a favorable pacing configuration and warrant validation in larger prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with electrical dyssynchrony requiring CRT (n=33). ECG-defined para-Hisian pacing (PHP) vs. Non-PHP configuration was evaluated on QRS duration at 6 months (p=< 0.01). ECG-defined para-Hisian RV pacing was associated with significantly narrower QRS duration (123.4 ms vs 151.9 ms, P<0.01) and greater left ventricular reverse remodeling compared to non-PHP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: