Key result
Garmin Elevate v4 sensor accurately tracks resting heart rate but shows poor heart rate variability accuracy.
Why the study?
Accurate resting HR and HRV monitoring is crucial for autonomic nervous system evaluation, but the validity and reliability of the Garmin Elevate v4 sensor compared to ECG reference were unclear.
Does the Garmin Forerunner 955 smartwatch provide valid and reliable resting HR and HRV measurements compared to reference ECG in healthy adults?
Observational (n=23)
Does the Garmin Forerunner 955 smartwatch provide valid and reliable resting HR and HRV measurements compared to reference ECG in healthy adults?
Effect estimate: r ≥ 0.94
The Garmin Elevate v4 sensor is highly reliable for basic heart rate tracking but lacks the absolute accuracy required to replace reference ECG-derived HRV for resting autonomic evaluation.
Accurate resting heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring is crucial for evaluating autonomic nervous system balance and guiding training. This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Garmin Forerunner 955 smartwatch (Elevate v4 sensor) against an electrocardiogram (ECG) reference for measuring resting HR and photoplethysmography (PPG)-derived pulse rate variability (PRV), evaluated through the root mean square of successive differences (rMSSDPRV), compared to reference ECG-derived HRV (rMSSDHRV). Twenty-three healthy adults underwent simultaneous assessments using the smartwatch and a Biopac ECG during short recordings in supine and seated positions under controlled breathing. For resting HR, the optical device demonstrated a near-perfect linear association (r ≥ 0.94) and substantial concordance with the ECG. While rMSSDPRV demonstrated good-to-excellent intrasession test–retest reliability, its agreement with ECG-derived rMSSDHRV was limited, showing significant proportional bias and wide limits of agreement. A significant proportional bias was detected, producing back-transformed limits of agreement that demonstrated relative measurement errors ranging from –43% to +52% in the supine position and from –41% to +118% in the seated position in isolated individual cases. Ultimately, the Garmin Elevate v4 is highly reliable for basic HR tracking and within-subject PRV trends, but it lacks the absolute accuracy required to replace reference ECG-derived HRV for individual resting autonomic evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casanova‐Lizón et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=23). Garmin Forerunner 955 smartwatch (Elevate v4 sensor) vs. Electrocardiogram (ECG) reference was evaluated on Resting heart rate and photoplethysmography (PPG)-derived pulse rate variability (PRV) (r ≥ 0.94). The Garmin Elevate v4 sensor showed near-perfect linear association for resting heart rate (r ≥ 0.94) but lacked absolute accuracy for heart rate variability, with measurement errors up to +118%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: