Key result
Repolarization markers after BiV pacing show no association with sustained ventricular arrhythmias.
Why the study?
QT dispersion and Tp-e interval have shown controversial results regarding their association with sustained ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with implanted CRT devices.
Cohort (n=31)
Single-blind
No
These QT parameters should not guide post-biventricular pacing arrhythmia risk stratification; leaves open identification of reliable predictors in prospective studies.
Introduction: QT dispersion (QTd) and Tp-e interval show controversial results in incidence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (SVA) in patients with heart failure (HF). In patients with implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device, there is a unique opportunity to record SVAs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of QTd and Tp-e interval on the incidence of SVAs after simultaneous biventricular (Biv) pacing. Methods: In the present study, 31 consecutive patients with advanced HF and implanted CRT device were evaluated one year for possible SVAs, corrected QT (QTc), QTd, and Tp-e interval. Patients were divided into two groups; with (group 1) and without (group 2) SVAs. Results: Among the studied patients, 5 (16%) experienced SVAs. The intrinsic and Biv pacing QTd were 70.74 ± 18.00 and 89.26 ± 28.00 msec, and 95.09 ± 44 and 88.09 ± 33 msec in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P = 0.18 and P = 0.16, respectively). Tp-e was not different between the two groups. In group 1, QTc increased from 438.83 ± 64 msec to 488.24 ± 48 msec (P = 0.13), and in group 2, it decreased from 499.70 ± 65.00 msec to 480.00 ± 31.00 msec after simultaneous Biv pacing (P = 0.13). Conclusion: QTd, Tp-e, and QTc did not differ significantly after Biv pacing to show any positive effect on the incidence of SVAs in part due to the severity of changes which already occur in patients with advanced HF. QTc, QTd, and Tp-e showed little changes after Biv pacing and probably do not have a significant role in the incidence of SVAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbarzadeh et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Advanced Heart Failure with implanted CRT device (n=31). Simultaneous biventricular (Biv) pacing vs. Intrinsic rhythm (baseline) was evaluated on QT dispersion (12-lead) during simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias compared to those without (p=0.94). QT dispersion, Tp-e interval, and corrected QT interval showed no significant differences after biventricular pacing between patients who developed sustained ventricular arrhythmias and those who did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: