Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Bone grafting of the cleft maxilla beforeeruption of the permanent cuspid has become an acceptedpart of the management of patients with clefts involving themaxillary alveolus. The reasons for performing a bone graftare to stabilize the maxillary segments and provide bonysupport for the teeth adjacent to the cleft.Objective: The aim of the present study is clinical andradiographic evaluation of the outcome and efficacy of stickybone (mixture of autologous fibrin glue (AFG) and bovinebone graft) as a bone substitute for the treatment of alveolarcleft.Patients and Methods: 41 patients with a total of 58alveolar clefts, 17 bilateral and 24 unilateral clefts, treatedby alveolar bone grafts using sticky bone. Their age rangedfrom 6 to 18 years with a mean of 11.6. The follow-up wasup to one year.Results: From a total number of 58 alveolar clefts.Adequate healing was resented in 47 of them [30 of themwere class I (51.7%) and 17 were class II (17%)]. Inadequatebone healing occurred in 11 clefts [6 of them were class III(10.3%) and 5 were class IV (8.6%)].Conclusions: Bone grafting of alveolar clefts is a mandatorystep in the management of cleft lip and palate patients,sticky bone could be considered as promising and effectivebony substitute and could be used efficiently for the treatmentof cleft alveolus as an alternative to autogenous bone graftsto avoid harvesting bone of the patient and its complicationsand the earlier the grafting producers are done, the betterquality of grafted bone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elborolosy et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: