Apple fruitlet thinning and harvesting are labor‐intensive operations requiring fruit to be detached from the tree. This paper presents a robotic end effector that uses vacuum suction to grasp target fruit and rotation to detach it. The suction cup is separated from the rotation drive, allowing it to be replaced according to fruit size and damage tolerance. Because thinning is restricted to a short seasonal window, four detachment principles were developed and tested in parallel off‐season using artificial fruitlet structures, enabling year‐round testing before field trials. In comparative field trials with 50 attempts per end effector, the suction design achieved the highest success rate at 70%, compared with 44% for cutting and 26% for the paraboloid design. Off‐season screening distinguished the strongest and weakest concepts but overestimated absolute field performance, indicating that in this study the artificial structure worked better as a feasibility filter than as a predictor of orchard performance. Integrated with vision and path planning, the suction end effector achieved a 66.1% success rate over 127 attempts in a commercial New Zealand orchard, with localization error the main cause of failure. Fitted with a harvesting cup, the same device also successfully detached mature apples in a preliminary demonstration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jangali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: