We present a leakage-averse and reproducible benchmark for temperature-dependent current–voltage (I–V) prediction in Al/CdZnO/p-Si Schottky diodes. Using a unified Leave-One-Temperature-Out (LOTO) protocol, we hold out one temperature per fold to assess prediction at held-out temperatures within the studied Al/CdZnO/p-Si device system. We compare classical regressors, including support vector regression (SVR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and random forest (RF), with LSTM-Many2One, CNN-LSTM, Attention-LSTM, and N-BEATS. We also include three benchmark methods to contextualize this comparison: nearest-temperature transfer, two-dimensional polynomial-ridge response-surface regression, and a thermionic-emission model incorporating series and shunt resistances. The seven data-driven models use sliding windows of 30 consecutive voltage points with the target temperature appended, whereas the three benchmark methods use method-specific direct or physically parameterized representations. Across the 11 temperature folds, N-BEATS yielded the lowest descriptive mean errors, with MSE=0.263±0.28, RMSE=0.461±0.236, and R 2 =0.989±0.008. MLP followed closely, while LSTM-Many2One remained competitive but more variable; CNN-LSTM performed poorly in this data regime. The benchmark methods yielded mean RMSE values from 0.755±0.167 to 1.091±0.417, with the thermionic-emission R s –R sh model producing the lowest benchmark-method error. N-BEATS yielded the lowest descriptive mean relative errors for the ideality factor and barrier height. Reconstructed interface-state density profiles also showed qualitative agreement with the experimental trends across the representative models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tulum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: