Design thinking is increasingly used in entrepreneurship education as a human-centred, experiment-driven pedagogy for navigating uncertainty and innovation. However, evidence remains fragmented across contexts, outcomes, and pedagogical implementations. Guided by PRISMA 2020, this systematic review synthesises post-2020 empirical and conceptual studies indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Following inclusion, exclusion, and quality appraisal, 18 peer-reviewed journal articles were retained for integrative thematic synthesis. Four themes emerged: sustainability and social-impact entrepreneurship learning; measured learning and psychological outcomes; digital, gamified, and platform-mediated learning; and programme and ecosystem design linking universities, communities, and industry. Across themes, design thinking was associated with opportunity recognition, creativity, experiential engagement, and competency development, while evidence concerning self-efficacy and longer-term entrepreneurial behaviour was heterogeneous. Overall, the evidence suggests that design thinking may offer greater educational value when integrating authentic problem discovery, iterative experimentation, reflective feedback, mentoring, and institutional support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Idris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: