This study examines why English encodes continuous temperature meaning through a small set of gradable adjectives and degree modifiers rather than a large enumerated vocabulary. Drawing on Kennedy’s (2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45) scale-structure framework and a register-stratified corpus of 1,131 tokens, we show that two principles operate at different levels of explanation. Gradation is the primary structural mechanism: relative-standard adjectives (cold, cool, warm, hot) attract degree modifiers at rates of 38–49 %, while absolute-standard adjectives (freezing, scorching) remain below 5 %, an asymmetry confirmed by chi-square tests ( p < 0.001) and logistic regression. Lexical economy is a secondary optimisation pressure: the combinatorial system yields economy ratios of 9–13:1 across domains. These findings support a unified account in which scale structure determines the architecture and economy shapes its size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dilyorjon Solidjonov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: