Key result
Rotational atherectomy is linked to postprocedural coronary microvascular dysfunction in ~43% of cases.
Why the study?
Rotational atherectomy modifies calcified plaques during PCI but may impair the coronary microcirculation through distal plaque debris embolization. This study evaluated changes in wire-free angiography-derived microvascular resistance (AMR) before and after rotational atherectomy and sought predictors of postprocedural coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Does rotational atherectomy increase angiography-derived microvascular resistance (AMR) and induce postprocedural coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with severely calcified coronary lesions?
Observational (n=40)
No
Does rotational atherectomy increase angiography-derived microvascular resistance (AMR) and induce postprocedural coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with severely calcified coronary lesions?
Rotational atherectomy consistently increases angiography-derived microvascular resistance (AMR), leading to coronary microvascular dysfunction in 42.5% of patients, particularly among those with diabetes mellitus, reduced LVEF, and lesions longer than 20 mm.
Rotational atherectomy was associated with postprocedural CMD; extends mechanistic data on microcirculatory injury but leaves clinical outcomes open.
Background: Calcified coronary lesions remain a major challenge during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Rotational atherectomy (RA) (Boston Scientific) is a well-established tool used to modify calcified plaques and facilitate stent delivery. Despite its mechanical benefits, RA may adversely affect coronary microcirculation through distal plaque debris embolization. Angiography-derived microvascular resistance (AMR) (Pulse Medical) is a wire-free index correlated with invasive indices such as the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), which allows assessment of microcirculatory resistance directly from angiographic images, without a pressure wire or adenosine. The objective of this study is to evaluate changes in AMR before and after RA and to identify clinical, angiographic, and procedural predictors of postprocedural coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center observational study including all patients who underwent RA between January 2023 and December 2024 at Clinique Saint-Hilaire in Rouen, France. AMR was measured before and after RA using the AngioPlus software (Pulse Medical). CMD was defined as postprocedural AMR > 250 mm Hg·s/m. Results: Of 49 RA procedures, 40 patients were included. AMR increased in all cases but CMD occurred in 42.5% of patients (n=17). Diabetes mellitus and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly more prevalent in the CMD group. Long coronary artery lesions (> 20 mm), larger plaque burden, and prolonged burr run time were associated with higher AMR values. Mean AMR rose from 176 to 315 mm Hg·s/m in the CMD group, versus 177 to 201 mm Hg·s/m in the non-CMD group. Conclusions: Performing RA affects the coronary microcirculation, especially in cases of diabetes mellitus and reduced LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koné et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Severely calcified coronary artery lesions treated with rotational atherectomy (n=40). Rotational atherectomy (Rotablator) vs. Pre-procedural baseline (and post-procedural CMD vs. non-CMD groups) was evaluated on Postprocedural coronary microvascular dysfunction (defined as angiography-derived microvascular resistance [AMR] > 250 mm Hg·s/m). Rotational atherectomy increased angiography-derived microvascular resistance in 100% of patients and resulted in postprocedural coronary microvascular dysfunction in 42.5% of cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: