Why the study?
Rotational atherectomy effectively manages calcified plaques but carries perceived heightened aggressiveness and periprocedural complication risk, prompting evaluation of the frequency and predictors of periprocedural myocardial infarction.
What are the frequency and predictive factors of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing rotational atherectomy?
What are the frequency and predictive factors of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing rotational atherectomy?
Periprocedural myocardial infarction after rotational atherectomy occurs in approximately 8% of patients and is strongly predicted by no/slow flow complications and high SYNTAX scores.
Identifies high-risk anatomical and procedural features for periprocedural MI during rotational ath.
Introduction: Rotational atherectomy (RA) presents superior efficacy over traditional balloon angioplasty in managing calcified plaques, albeit being associated with a perceived heightened aggressiveness and increased risk of periprocedural complications.Aim: To assess the frequency and predictive factors of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) following RA.Material and methods: This was a retrospective observational study, encompassing 534 patients.The definition of periprocedural MI was consistent with the 4 th universal definition of MI.Results: Periprocedural MI occurred in 45 (8%) patients.This subset tended to be older (74.6 8.2 vs. 72 9.3%; p = 0.04) with SYNTAX Score (SS) > 33 points (p = 0.01), alongside elevated rates of no/slow flow (p = 0.0003).These patients less often fulfilled the indication for RA, which is a non-dilatable lesion.The incidence of traditional risk factors was similar in both groups.Univariable logistic regression models revealed: male gender (OR = 0.54; p = 0.04), non-dilatable lesion (OR = 0.41; p = 0.01), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (OR = 0.07; p = 0.01) as negative and SS > 33 (OR = 2.8; p = 0.02), older age (OR = 1.04; p = 0.04), no/slow flow (OR = 7.85; p = 0.002) as positive predictors.The multivariable model showed that occurrence of no/slow flow (OR = 6.7; p = 0.02), SS > 33 (OR = 2.95; p = 0.02), non-dilatable lesion (OR = 0.42; p = 0.02), and prior CABG (OR = 0.08; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of periprocedural MI.Conclusions: Periprocedural MI after RA was not an uncommon complication, occurring in nearly one-twelfth of patients.Our analysis implicated female gender, older age, and more severe coronary disease in its occurrence.As expected, the presence of no/ slow flow amplified the risk of periprocedural MI, whereas prior CABG and non-dilatable lesions mitigated this risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Błaszkiewicz et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: