Key result
Hypertension without heart stress is linked to higher PREVENT-predicted risks than isolated NT-proBNP elevation.
Why the study?
Heart stress is an emerging condition defined by increased NT-proBNP in patients with risk factors such as hypertension, and whether it leads to higher predicted heart failure and cardiovascular disease risk according to PREVENT-HF, SCORE2, and PREVENT models needed to be determined.
Cross-Sectional (n=815)
Yes
In a cross-sectional analysis of 815 adults, hypertension alone predicted a significantly higher risk of heart failure and cardiovascular disease using PREVENT and PREVENT-HF models compared to elevated NT-proBNP (heart stress) alone, though the combination of both yielded the highest predicted risk.
Introduction Heart stress (HS) is an emerging condition defined as increased NT-proBNP in patients with risk factors such as hypertension (HT). Purpose The study aimed to determine if the presence of HS leads to a higher risk of developing heart failure (HF) as predicted by the PREVENT-HF model and higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk as predicted by SCORE2 and PREVENT models. Methods This study employed a cross-sectional design within the framework of the nationwide EH-UH 2 project, utilizing a representative random sample of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 years and older. In this analysis, we included 815 participants (mean age 59 years; 39.3% male). HS is defined as NT-proBNP levels of at least 75 pg/mL for participants younger than 50, at least 150 pg/mL for those aged 50 to 74, and at least 300 pg/mL for participants 75 years or older. Blood pressure was assessed according to ESH guidelines, with hypertension defined as either a blood pressure exceeding 140/90 mmHg or current use of antihypertensive medication. Risk assessments were performed with the SCORE2/SCORE2-OP, PREVENT, and PREVENT-HF models. Risk scores were evaluated across four groups, categorized by their HT and HS status: group A (HT- HS-), group B (HT+ HS-), group C (HT- HS+), and group D (HT+ HS+). Results All three risk scores were the lowest in group A, subjects without HS and HT, and were the highest in group D, those with HS and HT (table). Group B, HT subjects without HS had significantly higher PREVENT and, interestingly, PREVENT-HF risks than group C, HS subjects without HT (table and figure).Table 1Figure 1
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cepanec et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension and heart stress (elevated NT-proBNP) (n=815). Hypertension and/or heart stress (elevated age-specific NT-proBNP) vs. Subjects without hypertension or heart stress (HT- HS-), and isolated heart stress (HT- HS+) was evaluated on Predicted heart failure and cardiovascular disease risk scores (PREVENT-HF, PREVENT, and SCORE2/SCORE2-OP). Hypertension without heart stress was associated with significantly higher PREVENT and PREVENT-HF predicted risks than heart stress (elevated NT-proBNP) without hypertension among 815 adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: