Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work describes an advanced physics-based compact MOSFET model (SP). Both the quasistatic and nonquasi-static versions of SP are surface-potential-based. The model is symmetric, includes the accumulation region, small-geometry effects, and has a consistent current and charge formulation. The surface potential is computed analytically and there are no iterative loops anywhere in the model. Availability of the surface potential in the source-drain overlap regions enables a physics-based formulation of the extrinsic model (e.g., gate tunneling current) and allows for a noise model free of discontinuities or unphysical interpolation schemes. Simulation results are used to illustrate the interplay between the model structure and circuit design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gildenblat et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: