Analysis of Landslide Hazard Potential in Oro-Oro Ombo Village Based on the Conformity with the Batu City Spatial Plan (2010–2030) This study aim to landslide-prone zones, their conformity with the Batu City Spatial Plan 2010–2030, and community preparedness. A mixed-method approach was used, combining quantitative spatial analysis based on a geographic information system with field observation, interviews, and documentation. The sample was purposively selected from high-hazard locations and areas of land-use mismatch, complemented by 27 informants from the village government and community for field validation. Hazard levels were determined by weighting five parameters: rainfall (30%), geology (20%), soil type (20%), land use (15%), and slope gradient (15%). Results showed that most of the village fell within moderate (227.99 ha), high (144.85 ha), and very high (78.04 ha) hazard categories, while low-hazard areas covered only 4.28 ha. About 28.22% of the area was inconsistent with the spatial plan, mainly residential and tourism zones within high to very high hazard areas, and two active landslide points were found near a residential area and a riverbank. Most respondents (78%) had never received disaster socialization, and although 56% were aware of evacuation routes, overall preparedness remained low due to limited structured disaster education. This study recommends stricter spatial use controls, structural mitigation, and enhanced disaster education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anggun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: