Early diagnosis of sepsis urgently requires the development of novel electrochemical sensing platforms for rapid, sensitive, and multiplexed measurement of inflammatory biomarkers at the point of care. Herein, we report a closed bipolar electrochemical (cBPE) colorimetric platform that couples nanozyme-catalyzed redox cycling at the sensing pole with Prussian blue (PB) electrodeposition at the signal pole. Bimetallic Au@Pt nanozymes (Au core, porous Pt shell) catalyze the reduction of [Fe(CN)6]3– by ammonia borane (NH3·BH3) with a specific activity of 310 U mg–1, which is 12-fold higher than that of the Au core, and an apparent catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of 2.7 ×107 M–1 s–1, determined under the first-order kinetic regime. Sepsis biomarkers captured on immunomagnetic beads and labeled with detection antibody-conjugated Au@Pt nanozymes were magnetically enriched at the cBPE anode, where the nanozyme-generated [Fe(CN)6]4– was re-oxidized to [Fe(CN)6]3–, sustaining a redox cycle that amplifies the Faradaic current. Charge conservation across the cBPE converts this current into an equivalent cathodic flux in a physically separated signal chamber, where Fe3+ reduction drives deposition of a blue PB film whose grayscale intensity increases monotonically with target concentration and is read by the naked eye. The spatially addressable cBPE array allows interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum amyloid A (SAA) to be assayed in parallel, with the limits of detection of 0.83, 2.69, and 1.82 ng mL–1, respectively. In clinical serum samples from healthy controls (n = 11) and sepsis patients (n = 11), all three biomarkers were significantly elevated in the sepsis patients, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82–1.00, demonstrating discriminative performance in real samples. The proposed cBPE-based electrochemical colorimetric platform integrates catalytic signal amplification, wireless multiplexing, and visual readout, offering a practical route toward point-of-care detection of sepsis-associated biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: