Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), predominantly caused by serotype O foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), remains highly contagious and economically devastating worldwide. A significant challenge in disease control is that recovered or vaccinated animals can become asymptomatic carriers of persistent strains (Op), which are indistinguishable from acute wild-type (WT) strains using current diagnostic methods. In this study, we developed a duplex TaqMan real-time PCR assay based on comparative next-generation sequencing and genomic analysis of WT and persistent O FMDV strains. Conserved regions were identified for universal detection, and Op-specific single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutations were targeted for differential amplification using ARMS-PCR (amplification refractory mutation system PCR). The optimized assay, consisting of a co-detection channel and a typing channel, demonstrated excellent specificity with no cross-reactivity against host nucleic acids or unrelated cell lines, a detection limit of 5 copies/µL, and clear differentiation of WT from Op strains. Furthermore, the duplex assay successfully distinguished wild-type and persistent strains in infected cell samples and across different viral passages (PI30 and PI60). This duplex TaqMan RT-qPCR assay provides, for the first time, a sensitive, specific, and efficient tool for simultaneous detection and differentiation of wild-type and persistent O FMDV strains in infected cell samples and across viral passages. Although clinical validation remains to be performed, this assay offers a promising basis for further studies on FMD surveillance and the detection of viral persistence. Key points • First duplex TaqMan RT-qPCR assay differentiating wild-type and persistent O FMDV. • Detection limit of 5 copies/µL with no cross-reactivity against host nucleic acids. • Differentiates Op strains at passages 30 and 60, monitors persistence, aids control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: