Why the study?
Patient-specific finite element analysis of left ventricular mechanics requires discretized geometric models, which currently involves considerable manual work despite 2D echocardiography being the most widely used modality for assessing LV function.
Does a direct 2D-to-3D hexahedral meshing algorithm accurately reconstruct left ventricular geometry for finite element analysis from 2D echocardiography compared to standard volume calculation and generic meshing methods?
Does a direct 2D-to-3D hexahedral meshing algorithm accurately reconstruct left ventricular geometry for finite element analysis from 2D echocardiography compared to standard volume calculation and generic meshing methods?
This algorithm enables rapid (<0.2 s), automated generation of valid, finite-element-ready 3D left ventricular hexahedral meshes directly from routine 2D echocardiography with higher volumetric accuracy than the biplane Simpson method when three apical views are used.
Patient-specific finite element (FE) analysis of left ventricular (LV) mechanics requires a geometric model that is discretized for computation, a step that in current practice still involves considerable manual work. Because two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography is the most widely used modality for assessing LV function, we present an algorithm that converts segmented apical 2D views (one to three imaging planes) directly into a structured, layered hexahedral FE mesh controlled by three LV-specific parameters: the axial and circular divisions and the number of transmural element layers. All models generated with the same parameters share one mesh topology, so node-to-node correspondence across cardiac phases is obtained by construction and tracked endocardial motion can be imposed directly as a boundary condition. On analytical phantoms with known 3D geometry, reconstruction from three apical views reproduced the cavity volume to within 2.1% (biplane Simpson method: up to 10.8%), with a mean surface distance of 0.6–0.9 mm at a pixel size of 0.8 mm and a Dice coefficient of 0.95–0.98; reconstruction from a single view underestimated the volume by 5–20%, depending on the ellipticity of the cross-section. Applied to 36 segmented EchoNet-Dynamic images, the pipeline produced valid meshes (all elements with a positive Jacobian) in every case and at every resolution, in less than 0.2 s per model. A generic marching-cubes/TetGen route applied to the same geometry produced different node counts at end-diastole and end-systole and contained sliver elements. In a passive-filling problem (human Holzapfel–Ogden myocardium with rule-based fibers, end-diastolic pressure 8 mmHg), cavity volume, wall thickness, apex displacement, fiber strain and fiber stress changed by at most 0.8% between the 24 × 48 and the 36 × 72 surface divisions. The method therefore provides fast, controllable and FE-ready LV geometries from routine echocardiography, with an accuracy that is limited mainly by the number of available views and by the segmentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miličević et al. (2026) studied Left ventricular geometry reconstruction for finite element analysis (n=36). Structured layered hexahedral FE mesh reconstruction algorithm from 2D echocardiography vs. Biplane Simpson method and generic marching-cubes/TetGen route was evaluated on Cavity volume error, surface distance, Dice coefficient, and valid mesh generation rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: