Why the study?
The therapeutic management of cats with congestive heart failure is challenging due to the need for hemodynamic and respiratory stabilization, the risk of progression to refractory conditions, and complex cardiorenal interactions.
This veterinary narrative review synthesizes evidence-based strategies for managing feline congestive heart failure, emphasizing acute respiratory stabilization via oxygen, thoracentesis, and furosemide, alongside chronic individualized diuresis, thromboprophylaxis, and careful cardiorenal monitoring.
Therapeutic evidence for feline CHF remains sparse; leaves open optimal protocols pending prospective trials.
Congestive heart failure (CHF) in cats is a major clinical manifestation of cardiomyopathies and may progress to pulmonary edema, pleural effusion, and thromboembolic complications. The therapeutic management of these patients poses a challenge due to the need for hemodynamic and respiratory stabilization, the risk of progression to refractory conditions, and the complex interaction between cardiac and renal functions. This study aimed to analyze the scientific evidence regarding therapeutic strategies and the clinical management of CHF in cats. To this end, a narrative review was conducted using a search of the PubMed database with the search terms “Heart Failure” and “Cats.” The literature highlights the importance of emergency stabilization through oxygen therapy, thoracentesis for pleural effusion, and judicious administration of diuretics. In long-term follow-up and the management of cardiorenal syndrome, emphasis is placed on individualized diuretic therapy, control of complications, and continuous monitoring of renal function, with the goal of improving patients’ quality of life and survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ladeiras et al. (2026) conducted a review in Congestive heart failure in cats (feline cardiomyopathies). Therapeutic management of feline CHF (oxygen therapy, thoracentesis, furosemide, torsemide, pimobendan, clopidogrel) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: