Why the study?
Significant VHD is associated with adverse prognosis in ATTR-CM, but existing data were limited to isolated VHD rather than differences in outcomes between isolated and multiple VHD with and without AS.
Does significant valvular heart disease (isolated vs. multiple, with and without aortic stenosis) increase the risk of heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause death in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=694)
Yes
Does significant valvular heart disease (isolated vs. multiple, with and without aortic stenosis) increase the risk of heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause death in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy?
In patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis, significant valvular heart disease—particularly multiple valvular lesions involving aortic stenosis—is strongly associated with an increased risk of heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality.
Significant valvular heart disease (VHD) is associated with adverse prognosis in transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). However, data is limited to isolated VHD. We aimed at evaluating the difference in outcome between isolated and multiple VHD, and particularly with and without aortic stenosis (AS). Patients with ATTR-CM were retrospectively included in a multicentric registry. The endpoint was a composite of heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause death. Of the 694 patients (mean age 75 ± 13 years,74%male), 302(44%) presented with significant VHD. Of these, 98 had VHD including AS (isolated AS in 45%;multiple VHD with AS in 55%), while 204 had VHD without AS (isolated in 64%, multiple VHD in 36%). During a median follow-up of 22(8–38) months, 217(31%) patients reached the endpoint. Significant VHD was associated with worse outcomes than no-VHD (log-rank p < 0.001; HR:3.275; 95%CI (2.472–4.337), remaining significant after adjustment (HR2.006 (1.193–3.047);p = 0.007). Stratification by the presence of AS, and according to isolated or multiple VHD, revealed that isolated significant AS ((HR: 2.462; 95%CI (1.233–4.917); p = 0.011), and multiple VHD including significant AS, had the highest risk for adverse outcomes ((HR: 3.385; 95%CI (1.744–6.573);p < 0.001). In ATTR-CM, significant VHD is strongly associated with poor prognosis, with the highest risk for adverse events in significant multiple VHD including AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarrazyn et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) (n=694). Significant valvular heart disease (VHD) vs. No significant valvular heart disease (no-VHD) was evaluated on Composite of heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause death (HR 2.006, 95% CI 1.193-3.047, p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: