Key result
PCI linked to ~27% higher risk of inpatient depressive symptoms in stable angina.
Why the study?
Depression is present in 1 of 5 outpatients with CAD and is a risk factor for recurrent cardiac events and mortality, prompting examination of the impact of PCI on depressive symptoms in patients with chronic stable angina.
Observational (n=171)
Non-randomized
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant in-hospital depression monitoring after PCI for stable angina; leaves open causality and outcome impact.
OBJECTIVE: Depression is present in 1 of 5 outpatients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and a well-documented risk factor for recurrent cardiac events and mortality. We examined the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), on depressive symptoms, in chronic stable angina (CSA) patients. METHODS: On prospective and non-randomized trial, consecutive CSA patients (n=171), who had undergone coronary angiography from January 2006 to December 2007, were included. Patients were subdivided into PCI and non-PCI groups, and then completed 21-item the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), at the baseline and pre-discharge, to assess the depressive symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 108 (63%) patients were assigned to the non-PCI group, and 63 (37%) patients to the PCI group. Using an independent t-test, we found that patients with PCI were significantly older (non-PCI vs. PCI; 57±11 vs. 64±10, years, p<0.001), had more joint disease (12.0 vs. 27.0%, p=0.013), more stroke history (5.6 vs. 17.5%, p=0.012) and higher incident of family history of cardiovascular disease (28.7 vs. 46.0%, p=0.025), but less religion (54.6 vs. 36.5%, p=0.002) and private health insurance (43.5 vs. 20.6%, p=0.002). The mean difference of BDI-II score between the baseline and pre-discharge was higher in patients with PCI (OR: 1.266; 95% CI: 1.146-1.398, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PCI contributes independently to higher risk of developing depressive symptoms in CSA patients during hospitalization; Routine assessment and management of PCI related depressive symptoms are justified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Chronic stable angina (n=171). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Coronary angiography without PCI (non-PCI) was evaluated on Mean difference between pre-discharge and baseline Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score (OR 1.266, 95% CI 1.146-1.398, p=<0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention independently increased the risk of developing depressive symptoms during hospitalization in chronic stable angina patients (OR 1.266, 95% CI 1.146-1.398, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: