Key result
Positive composite AI-ECG is linked to ~3.8-fold higher risk of incident structural heart disease.
Why the study?
Structural heart disease drives heart failure and cardiovascular mortality but remains underdiagnosed, and echocardiography is limited as a population-level screening tool. Whether a composite AI-ECG combining left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction models identifies prevalent and predicts incident structural heart disease across diverse populations required evaluation.
Does a composite artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) combining left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction models identify prevalent and predict incident structural heart disease across diverse multinational populations?
Cohort (n=82,368)
Yes
Does a composite artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) combining left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction models identify prevalent and predict incident structural heart disease across diverse multinational populations?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A composite AI-ECG combining existing systolic and diastolic dysfunction models without retraining effectively detects prevalent and predicts incident structural heart disease across diverse multinational populations, offering an immediately deployable tool to prioritize echocardiographic referral.
Background Structural heart disease (SHD) drives heart failure and cardiovascular mortality but remains underdiagnosed, and echocardiography is limited as a population-level screening tool. Objectives We evaluated whether a composite artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG), combining independently developed models for left ventricular systolic (LVSD) and diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), identifies prevalent and predicts incident SHD across diverse populations. Methods In this multinational cohort study, detection was assessed cross-sectionally in a Korean clinical cohort (Incheon Sejong Hospital) and a US dataset (Columbia University Irving Medical Center), and incident risk was assessed in the Korean cohort and the UK Biobank among individuals without baseline SHD or heart failure. Adults with paired ECG and echocardiography were analyzed for detection, with the composite defined as positive on either model. SHD comprised reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, moderate or severe valvular disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, or pulmonary hypertension. Detection was assessed by sensitivity and specificity, and incident risk by Cox models and the C statistic. Results Among 46,082 and 36,286 participants in the two detection cohorts, the composite detected SHD with sensitivity of 71.8% and 76.1% and specificity of 88.3% and 70.1%, with positivity across all phenotypes. Among at-risk individuals, composite positivity was associated with incident SHD (hazard ratios, 3.75 and 2.75), with C statistics of 0.69 to 0.78. Conclusions A composite AI-ECG identified prevalent and predicted incident SHD across multinational cohorts, capturing signals beyond its training targets and supporting its potential as a scalable cardiovascular screening tool; whether ECG-based risk stratification improves outcomes requires prospective evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Structural heart disease (SHD) (n=82,368). Composite artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) combining left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) models vs. Composite AI-ECG negativity (negative on both LVSD and LVDD models) was evaluated on Prevalent structural heart disease detection (reduced LVEF, moderate or severe valvular disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, or pulmonary hypertension) and incident SHD (HR 3.75). Composite AI-ECG detected prevalent SHD with 71.8%-76.1% sensitivity and 70.1%-88.3% specificity, and predicted incident SHD (HR 3.75 and 2.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: