Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article analyzes the literary figure of Enrique Jardiel Poncela through the lens of a fundamental tension between popular appeal and avant-garde aesthetics. On the one hand, Jardiel understands literature as a profession and actively seeks a broad audience; on the other, he strongly asserts his artistic individuality and upholds a demanding concept of literary originality, often expressing disdain for mass audiences. This apparent contradiction is resolved through his systematic use of parody, which enables him to reconcile formal experimentation with accessibility. The study traces the development of parody in Jardiel’s work, from his early contributions to humorous magazines to its full realization in his parodic sentimental novels. Over time, parody evolves from a burlesque imitation relying on anachronism and linguistic play into a more sophisticated, self-reflexive strategy that foregrounds fictionality and aligns with the principles of dehumanized art. Consequently, Jardiel emerges as a representative of a popular avant-garde, renewing literary genres while maintaining a strong connection with readers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Manuel Alonso Feito (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: